Guynn v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Marjorie and Harry Guynn, appeal from a denial of their C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion. We affirm.
Plaintiffs’ suit stems from their claim for payments from defendant, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company, for certain medical treatments required for plaintiffs’ injuries which resulted from an automobile accident. In June 1984, based on the agreement of both counsel, the court ordered the matter set for jury trial at 9:30 A.M. on Monday, October 1, 1984, with three days allowed for its completion. On the morning of October 1,1984, when plaintiffs’ case was called, neither…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Craig v. RiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Tyler v. Adams County Department of Social Services Ex Rel. TylerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- BA Leasing Corp. v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Finegold v. ClarkeColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guevara v. FoxhovenColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Valley Bank of Frederick v. RoweColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- McElvaney v. BatleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Justi v. Rho Condominium Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Rainsberger v. KleinColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.