Painich v. Turk

Plaintiff sues Joe and Phillip Turk' for $200.00,' the amount of an alleged loan made to them by him. He also under appropriate averments, sued out a writ of attachment under which the sheriff seized certain staves belonging to the defendant, Joe Turk.

Phillip Turk denies being indebted to plaintiff and from a judgment in his favor plaintiff does not appeal.

The defence of Joe Turk is that he got the $200.00 from plaintiff not as a *210loan but as an advance payment on 35,000 staves which he alleges he agreed to sell and plaintiff to buy at the price of $145.00, per 1000.

Alleging plaintiff’s…