Legal Opinion

Breedlove v. Aiken

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1952No. 33934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWobhill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The sole question presented for determination is, whether or not the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations, which for injuries to the person is two years. Code, § 3-1004. The alleged claim arising out of the tonsillectomy is barred, since the claim arose on January 20, 1949, and the action was not brought until January 20, 1951, two years and one day thereafter. However, the petition allegés that the defendant did not inform the plaintiff of the two operations performed on January 14, 1949, until January 28, 1949.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morris v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Poullain v. PoullainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Anderson v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Kirkley v. SharpSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toombs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Charter Peachford Behavioral Health System, Inc. v. Kohout.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Sutlive v. HackneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Crawford v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Piedmont Pharmacy, Inc. v. PatmoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Brown v. KinserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API