Legal Opinion

Sidford & Greene, Inc. v. Wehmeyer Coal Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

Plaintiff seeks the purchase price of coal claimed to have been sold and delivered to defendant. Concededly there was no delivery. Plaintiff, however, contends that it is entitled to recover on the ground that the coal in question was appropriated to the use of the defendant, that title to it passed to defendant, and hence that defendant is hable for the purchase price. Although the complaint alleges delivery, if the plaintiff’s proof established a proper appropriation, and that title had passed to defendant, plaintiff would be entitled to recover. (Berkshire Cotton Mfg. Co. v. Cohen, 236 N.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berkshire Cotton Manufacturing Co. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Bready v. . B.A. Wechsler Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Reichbart v. Smith-Eisemann Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Rochester Ry. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Syracuse Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Travelers Club, Inc. v. HostetterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API