Legal Opinion

State v. Ratliff

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1972No. 43Published

1Opinion of the Court

189 S.E.2d 179 (1972)

281 N.C. 397

STATE of North Carolina

v.

John R. RATLIFF.

No. 43.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 16, 1972.

James Godwin Taylor, Asst. Public Defender, for the defendant-appellant.

Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., William F. O'Connell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of North Carolina.

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant's first, second and third assignments of error are based on the contention that the warrantless search of his automobile was illegal. Hence, defendant argues, the fruits of the search were tainted and inadmissible as evidence against him.

Unreasonable searches and seizures…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API