Legal Opinion

Fulton Investment Co. v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 5, 1925No. 10,948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below, the court directed a verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff brings the case here on error.

The complaint, in form, contains two causes of action. For a first cause of action it alleged that one Alice Hopkins in 1912 was the owner of section 25-1-68, and granted to said defendant a right of way across the same for a pipe line for irrigation.

The complaint further alleges that at the same time the defendant entered into' an agreement granting to said Hopkins, her heirs, successors and assigns, the right perpetually to use said pipe line for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walters v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Kluska v. YeomansWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Denver Consolidated Electric Co. v. WaltersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Elkton Consolidated Mining & Milling Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  5. Erskine v. SavageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. MarsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Fulton Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Smith v. GvirtzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  4. James v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Joslin v. Idaho Times Publishing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API