Charles Wilcox v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
The issue presented here is whether the exclusive remedy provision of the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law, Mo.Rev.Stat. § 287.040 (1986), is a defense to a negligence action brought against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80, for injuries suffered by the employee of a contractor of the Army and Air Force Exchange Services (AAFES), an instrumentality of the United States government. The District Court 1 concluded that the test to apply when determining whether a party is a statutory employer, set forth in Green v. Crunden Martin…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Albert Roelofs, Jr. v. United States of America, the Travelers Insurance Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Viselli v. Missouri Theatre Building Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Green v. Crunden Martin Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Walter L. Griffin v. United States of America, and Capitol City Moving & Storage Company, and Allstate Insurance Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bass v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- Borah v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997