Legal Opinion

Charles Wilcox v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1990No. 90-1185PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented here is whether the exclusive remedy provision of the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law, Mo.Rev.Stat. § 287.040 (1986), is a defense to a negligence action brought against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80, for injuries suffered by the employee of a contractor of the Army and Air Force Exchange Services (AAFES), an instrumentality of the United States government. The District Court 1 concluded that the test to apply when determining whether a party is a statutory employer, set forth in Green v. Crunden Martin…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Albert Roelofs, Jr. v. United States of America, the Travelers Insurance Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Viselli v. Missouri Theatre Building Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Green v. Crunden Martin Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Walter L. Griffin v. United States of America, and Capitol City Moving & Storage Company, and Allstate Insurance Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bass v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
  2. Borah v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API