Legal Opinion

Claim of Morrell v. Onondaga County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.

Appeals from two decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 23, 1994 and June 11, 1996, which ruled that claimant’s current condition was caused by a prior exposure at work.

In 1988, claimant was employed as a caseworker by the Onondaga County Department of Social Services. In the spring of that year, claimant—along with other employees employed at the County’s Civil Center building—began to experience significant eye, throat and nose irritation. The County Health Department investigated the source of the irritation and concluded that the respiratory symptoms were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Kroeger v. New York State Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Claim of Gonzalez v. Ozalid Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Bates v. Marine Midland BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Claim of the Estate of Kramer v. Ultra Blend Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Claim of Keeley v. Jamestown City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of MorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Claim of Gandolfo v. MTK ElectronicsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API