Legal Opinion

Timothy Lee Newton v. Jeremiah Nixon

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 12, 2004No. 04-2562Unpublished

1Per curiam

Timothy Lee Newton brought an action for damages, claiming the Missouri Attorney General had engaged in fraud when he opposed Newton’s earlier federal habeas corpus petition. The district court * viewed this action as an attempt to revive the habeas case, and dismissed the complaint. After careful review, we conclude dismissal was proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). Newton’s action was legally frivolous because it depended on the habeas court’s having wrongly determined his petition was time-barred. See Kelly v. Armstrong, 141 F.3d 799, 801 (8th Cir.1998) (issue preclusion).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API