Legal Opinion

State v. Yarborough

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 31, 2005No. 3938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

Ernest Yarborough was convicted of obstruction of justice in 1997. He appealed, and our court remanded the issue of jury misconduct to the extent that premature deliberations were alleged. On remand, the trial court denied Yarborough’s request for a new trial, finding Yarborough had not made a prima facie showing that premature deliberations had occurred. We affirm.

FACTS

Ernest Yarborough, an attorney, was convicted of obstruction of justice for offering an alleged victim $500 to drop charges against his client. Before being sentenced, Yarborough requested a new trial, alleging…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. AldretSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. CutterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GeerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. ColdenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. GalimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. GeerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API