Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1923No. 7810Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

CONCURRING OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

To enforce the provisions of the Constitution declaring that in a criminal case “the accused shall have right to demand nature and cause of accusation against him, and to have a copy thereof,” and “shall not be held to answer for criminal offense, unless on indictment of grand jury,” the Legislature has enacted statutes setting forth certain requisites essential to the validity of an indictment, and the courts have uniformly insisted, both in averment and proof, upon a substantial compliance with these provisions. See Huntsman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Alexander v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API