Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 9, 2016No. Case No. 5D16-2426Published

1Per curiam

Marshall S. Vaughan challenges the order summarily denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to address one of his claims. We agree and reverse.

Vaughan pled no contest to the felony battery of Cristina Hicks. In his rule 3.850 *880motion, Vaughan alleged newly discovered evidence, including, among others, an affidavit by Cristina Hicks, in which she stated that she fabricated all of the allegations against Vaughan and he “never put his hands on” her. The trial court denied Vaughan’s motion without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Purse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Hatcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API