Legal Opinion

Wemme v. First Church of Christ

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1924Published

1Opinion

Motion to recall mandate denied February 26, 1924.

On Motion to Recall Mandate.

(223 Pac. 250.)

McCOURT, J.

Claiming to be entitled to attorney’s fees out of the trust fund which is the subject of this litigation, W. P. La Roche, an attorney of this court, has applied for an order directing that the mandate heretofore issued herein be recalled and amended or modified so as to authorize the allowance of such attorney’s fees.

After this suit was commenced, it came to the attention of the Attorney General that the funds and property involved in the litigation belonged to a public charity. Thereupon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Downing v. . MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. State v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API