Legal Opinion
Bono v. McCutcheon
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 2005No. 2004 CA 23PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wolff, Judge.
{¶ 1} Gina Bono appeals from a judgment of the Clark County Court of Common Pleas, which granted the motion of Matthew and Beth McCutcheon to dismiss her complaint, pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6).
{¶ 2} According to Bono’s complaint, on August 29, 2002, Bono and Matthew McCutcheon entered into a written contract for the sale of a whippet puppy named Doozie from McCutcheon to Bono. Doozie was purchased as a “show potential” dog, meaning that she was of a quality to be shown at events sponsored or recognized by the American Kennel Club. Doozie was also of a quality to be bred. As per…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- York v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Hickman v. CapotsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Woods v. SharkinOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Alexander Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Vill. of AlbanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Windsor Realty & Mgt., Inc. v. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Fast Tract Title Servs., Inc. v. BarryOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Riveredge Dentistry Partnership v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.