Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 9, 1990No. 89-234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Following a conviction for possession of crack cocaine, appellant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress and the trial court’s imposition of a “probationary split sentence.” We affirm.

According to Officer Parsons, an informant equipped with a wireless transmitter radioed to him that he was witnessing a car near the Ebony Lounge from which a female was distributing crack cocaine to individuals outside the lounge. The Officer said that, according to the informant, the female subsequently reentered the car with crack still on her person and there was crack in the car…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. United States v. Juan Manuel Bautista, United States of America v. Javier Cabrera-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. State v. RuizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Harper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Bush v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API