Legal Opinion

United States v. Flower

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 20, 2019No. 18-3041Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-3041 United States v. Flower UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. VerkhoglyadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API