Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Skinner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1933No. 41618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kindig, C. I.

— On February 10, 1922, a trust agreement was entered into by and between Luracy Skinner, Henry W. Skinner, Roy H. Skinner, Ben B. Skinner, and Emma E. Skinner. According to the terms of this trust agreement, Roy H. Skinner, the appellant, was to become the trustee, and Henry W. Skinner and Ben B. Skinner the objectors and appellees, and Luracy Skinner and Emma E. Skinner were to be the beneficiaries. Roy H. Skinner, the appellant, was appointed trustee under the foregoing contract by the district court. He then qualified by furnishing bond. When thus qualified, the trustee…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Weston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Keating v. KeatingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Brewer v. JacobsUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
  4. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Bookhart v. YoungloveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morrison v. AsherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Heirs of Enfield v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Riordan v. RiordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. In Re Estate of RorickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. In Re Guardianship of ArrakSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API