Legal Opinion
Uttinger v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 28, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the use of controlled substances after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presencé of opiates. To the extent that petitioner raises a substantial evidence issue herein, we find that the misbehavior report, together with the positive results of the urinalysis tests…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Foust v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Harris v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Perez v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Garcia v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Victor v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Zippo v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lindo v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Spulka v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Perkins v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.