Legal Opinion
Abourezk v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 22, 1975No. Nos. 74-2072, 74-2074PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PER CURIAM.-
On consideration of petitioner’s petition for rehearing en banc and of. petitioner’s motion for leave to file a supplement thereto, it is
Ordered by the Court, en banc, that petitioner’s motion for leave to file supplement is granted, and, no Judge of the Court in regular active service having called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
Further ordered by the Court, en banc, that the aforesaid petition for rehearing is denied.
A statement of Chief Judge BAZELON, joined in by Circuit Judge J. SKELLY WRIGHT, is attached. BAZELON, C. J.
Petitioner has requested a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., and National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Federal Power Commission, Sierra Pacific Power Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Chatham Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Public Service Commission for the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Mobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Gulf Oil Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Sohio Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, the California Company, Intervenor. Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the California Company, Intervenor. Blanco Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, Continental Oil Company, Intervenors. Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the California Company, Intervenor. The Superior Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the California Company, Cities Service Oil Company, Intervenors. The California Company, a Division of Chevron Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Amoco Production Company v. Federal Power Commission, Amerada Hess Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Phillips Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Municipal Distributors Group v. Federal Power Commission, United Distribution Companies, Intervenors. Public Service Commission for the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Mobil Oil Corporation, Intervenors. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, United Distribution Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
3Cited by17 opinions
- Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. Dr. Eula Bingham, Assistant Secretary of Labor, the American Petroleum Institute, the National Petroleum Refiners Association on Behalf of Their Respective Members and American Petrofina, Incorporated v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, Dr. Eula Bingham, Assistant Secretary of Labor, and Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, Manufacturing Chemists Association, American Iron and Steel Institute, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Industrial Union Dept., Afl-Cio and United Rubber Workers, Afl-Cio, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- American Public Gas Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Fender v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Pearce v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Industrial Union Department v. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.