Legal Opinion

Kenefick v. Co-operative Building Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The action is for an accounting and is brought by an alleged shareholder of the defendant, which company, it is averred, was organized under chapter 122 of the Laws of 1851, entitled “An act for the incorporation of building, mutual loan and accumulating fund associations,” the provisions of which act have since been incorporated in article 5 of the Banking Law (Laws of 1892, chap. 689, as amd. by Laws of 1894, chap. 705). The complaint alleges that on or about the 15th day of September, 1899, the plaintiff became a- shareholder of the defendant, and, further, “that the plaintiff as such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Schantz v. . OakmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Pawlick v. Homestead Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Wolfe v. Conkey Avenue Savings, Aid & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pooley v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. 300 Broadway Realty Corp. v. KommitNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Holt v. HopkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API