Legal Opinion

Smith v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1968No. 43307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

In a workmen’s compensation case payments must be computed under Code Ann. § 114-405 “where the incapacity for work ... is partial.” The extent of disability is not computed on physical disability alone, for, as stated in Employers Liab. Assur. Corp. v. Hollifield, 93 Ga. App. 51 (90 SE2d 681), a partial physical disability may result in a total loss of earning capacity, nor is it computed alone on what the claimant is actually earning, for, as stated in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Wilson, 215 Ga. 746 (113 SE2d 611), a woman who, although drawing no earnings, was physically looking…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. HollifieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Smith v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API