Anderson v. Hancock
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order granting defendant a new trial in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino. Bolee, J. The land was described in the deed referred to in the opinion as the “Sylvester Bryant Tract of the Museupiabe Banch.”
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order granting defendant a new trial in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino. Bolee, J. The land was described in the deed referred to in the opinion as the “Sylvester Bryant Tract of the Museupiabe Banch.” It was objected to the deed when offered in evidence that the words “ and to all owners and claimants known and unknown” were erased in two places and also the words “two dollars,” but these words do not appear in the copy of the deed in the bill of exceptions.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court :
The description of the premises in the tax deed appears to us to be sufficient.
It does not appear by the record that there were any erasures in the deed. The copy set out in the bill of exceptions discloses none, and there is no evidence that there were any. The motion for a new trial may have been granted on the ground that no erasures appeared upon the face of the deed.
Order affirmed.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Anderson v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884