State v. Roberts

Goode, J.,

concurred in this opinion. J. T. Blaib, J., now Chief Justice, delivered a concurring opinion, holding that there was evidence justifying an instruction on the law of imperfect self-defense, but dissenting from the ruling that there was no substantial evidence tending to prove appellant acted in the exercise of perfect self-defense.

Woodson and Geaves, JJ., concurred in this opinion. Walkee, J., delivered a dissenting opinion, in-which WilliamsoN, J., concurred, holding that the evidence did not warrant an instruction on manslaughter, and that the judgment should be affirmed. •

*299*298III…