Legal Opinion

Vlissidis v. Anadell

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 5, 1959No. 12353PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Chief Judge.

This is a deportation case. On the morning when this cause was scheduled for oral argument before this Court, proper and adequate notice having theretofore been given, a telegram was received from the attorney for plaintiff-appellant stating that he was indisposed by reason of a cold, but that if he were physically able, weather conditions would prevent his attendance at the hearing. The Assistant United States Attorney representing appellee, agreed that the case might be considered by the Court on the briefs of each party. This procedure has been followed.

Some months ago…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Isao Hitai, Also Known as Mario Isao Hitai v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Arthur Sparrow v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  3. Wong Chung Che and Wong Pui Tong v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  4. Alfredo Guzman-Flores v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service, Pedro Castellanos-Castillo v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  5. Anastasios Katris A/K/A Stash Katres v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API