Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Farrell

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSydney F. Foster, J.

In these article 78 proceedings, originally commenced jointly by five State employees, three of whom have since discontinued the proceeding as to them, the two *439remaining petitioners, David O’Brien and John Mattice, separately seek review of certain determinations removing them from employment as civil defense safety representatives in the New York State Civil Defense Commission, and demand judgments directing their retention. Both petitioners have continued in employment since October 3, 1962 by virtue of a stay granted by the late Mr. Justice MacAffeb pending the disposition of these…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hennessey v. FarrellNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. O'Brien v. FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  4. Tarigo v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API