Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Hollinger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff was injured in an automobile collision. In the first trial the jury returned a verdict against the plaintiff; however, upon appeal, we reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. Dickson v. Hollinger, 257 Or 89, 476 P2d 557 (1970). At the second trial the jury found for the plaintiff and the defendant is now the appellant.

The defendant has made 11 assignments of error. We hold they are without merit.

The trial court correctly interpreted our decision on the first appeal and removed the defense of contributory negligence as there was no evidence that the plaintiff had actual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Cary v. BurrisOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Dickson v. HollingerOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Eggiman v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Reinan v. Pacific Motor Trucking CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hollinger v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Swanson v. Eagle Crest Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API