Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Great American Industries

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 17, 1992No. 997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

979 F.2d 924

61 USLW 2342, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,236

Alexander WILSON, individually and as representative of all

minority shareholders of Chenango Industries, Inc., other

than defendants on and before October 18, 1979,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,

v.

GREAT AMERICAN INDUSTRIES, INC., as corporate entity and as

a sole shareholder of Chenango Industries, Inc.; Milton

Koffman; Burton I. Koffman; Richard E. Koffman; as

Directors of Great American Industries, Inc.; Chenango

Industries, Inc.; Joseph M. Stack, as the representative of

Chenango Industries in the merger between Chenango and Great

America…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. SandbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Batchelder v. KawamotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Digital Island Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  3. Heiser v. RyanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API