Arculin v. Commonwealth

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The issue in this unemployment compensation case is whether the unemployment of the appellant, Joseph Arculin, came about by action of his employer or was *540due to Ms “voluntarily leaving work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.” If the latter, he is not entitled to compensation by Section 402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. [1937] 2897, 43 P.S. §802(b) (1).

Mr. Arculin, 62 years of age and now receiving Social Security retirement benefits, had worked for Murray Equipment Co. as a production worker for about…