Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Mathias

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 1900No. Nos. 12,196—(239)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in the district court for Faribault county to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on property of defendants T. N. Mathias and Rose-now & Bleedorn. All other lien holders were made parties defendant, among them F. I. Crane and Revord & Holmes.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Faribault county to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on property of defendants T. N. Mathias and Rose-now & Bleedorn. All other lien holders were made parties defendant, among them F. I. Crane and Revord & Holmes. The case was tried before Quinn, J., who found against plaintiffs, but in favor of defendants Crane and Revord & Holmes for $465.30 and $103.35 and an attorney’s fee respectively, and ordered judgment for the foreclosure of their liens for such amounts on the property of defendant Mathias. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant Mathias…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Respondents had judgment in the court below, and defendant Mathias appeals from an order denying a new trial.

The facts are as follows: Appellant, Mathias, owned a lot adjoin*65ing one owned bj Rosenow & Bleedorn, in the village of Wells, tbis state. On August 23, 1897, defendant Swenson entered into a contract with said Rosenow & Bleedorn to furnish the material for and to construct upon their lot a store building for the consideration of $2,350, and at the same time entered into a contract with defendant Mathias to furnish the material for and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. ShepardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. PomeroySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Town of Campbell v. WaiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Hess v. StockardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API