Legal Opinion
Gulf Coast Title Co. v. Walters
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 11, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
The writ of error brings for review an order granting a new trial on motion timely presented.
The motion contained three grounds', as follows:
“1. Judgment is contrary to law.
“2. Judgment is contrary to evidence.
“3. Judgment is contrary to the law and evidence, and for other good and sufficient reasons.”
The order on the motion was as follows:
“After argument of counsel for respective parties, the motion is granted, on the first ground of the motion in that petitioner’s motion for nonsuit should have been granted. Defendant by counsel excepts.”
This Court will not judge the correctness of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoopes v. CraneSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- O'Steen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- White v. CrandallSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Dunnellon Phosphate Co. v. Crystal River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912
- City of Deland v. FearingtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomas, Et Ux. v. VickersSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- County of Okeechobee v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Heuacker v. FarrellySupreme Court of Florida · 1938