Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Brown v. Schreiner
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 2011No. Nos. 2010-CA-1436, 2010-CA-1437Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJones, J.
|,I agree with the finding of the majority that the Appellant, American Wholesale Fence Company, Inc. (“AWFC”), untimely sought review of the judgments of the district court granting the exceptions of no cause of action of the Appellees, Marion VanDenburgh Pritchard and the Orleans Parish Levee District, as to the mandamus and petitory actions of AWFC. However, as to the third issue raised by AWFC, I would reverse the judgment of the district court.
The third issue raised on appeal by AWFC is that the district court erred in granting the exception of prescription of *709Ms. Pritchard as to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Campo v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co., Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Starns v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- STATE ETC. v. City of PinevilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Lake Providence Equipment Co. v. Tallulah Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.