In re DeGrasse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Frank DeGrasse, Jr. was admitted to the practice *108of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on December 15, 1999 and, at all times relevant to this proceeding, maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
Previously, this Court immediately suspended respondent from the practice of law until further order due to his failure to cooperate with the Committee’s investigation into his neglect of five legal matters and mishandling of monies, and based upon uncontested evidence of misconduct which threatened…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re ChilewichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re BerenholtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re DeGrasseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008