Legal Opinion
United States v. Borax Consol., Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 27, 1945No. 23690-GPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
The United States in its complaint herein (filed September 14, 1944) charges defendants with monopoly and conspiracy contrary to the prohibitions of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, and 4, and prays that certain contracts between the parties be adjudged illegal, that defendants be enjoined from performing the same, and for the appointment of a receiver to sell the properties of certain of the defendants in order to effectuate the dissolution of the alleged combine.
Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground “that the complaint fails to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ruoff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Schmieder v. HallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Bunzen v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- In re Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1950
- In re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.