In the Interest of R. H. L.

Barnes, Judge.

Claiming insufficient evidence, R. H. L.’s mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child. Because the trial court was authorized to find that there was clear and convincing evidence in favor of termination, we affirm.

In reviewing a biological parent’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we determine whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent’s rights to custody have been lost. In the Interest of A. C., 230 Ga. App.…