Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Olsen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1990No. 16885Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

Commonplace it is to have appeals by the State of South Dakota briefed and argued by the Attorney General’s office; however, this ease was briefed and then argued by the State’s Attorney of Union County at the State Capitol.

In his argument, the State’s Attorney lamented that lacking a manslaughter conviction “all we can do is to go careless driving” and “get a fine out of him.” The implication was clear (and he so argued): South Dakota should have some law on the books to prosecute an offender whose criminal acts fall between “manslaughter” and “careless driving” — if “reckless driving” does…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SeidschlawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. OakieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API