State v. Olsen
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice
Commonplace it is to have appeals by the State of South Dakota briefed and argued by the Attorney General’s office; however, this ease was briefed and then argued by the State’s Attorney of Union County at the State Capitol.
In his argument, the State’s Attorney lamented that lacking a manslaughter conviction “all we can do is to go careless driving” and “get a fine out of him.” The implication was clear (and he so argued): South Dakota should have some law on the books to prosecute an offender whose criminal acts fall between “manslaughter” and “careless driving” — if “reckless driving” does…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SeidschlawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. OakieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982