Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stokes v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1925No. 11683Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(concurring and dissenting) :

Action upon a policy of fire insurance, issued September 17, 1921, to M. B. Stokes and M. L. Stokes (husband and wife), in the sum of $4,000, upon the following property: The gin building, $1,500; the gin, $1,500, and the engine, $1,000. The entire property was destroyed by fire November 23, 1921.

The insurance company denied liability for the loss upon these grounds: (1) That, before the loss, the insured had assigned the policy to the Bank of Oates, causing a forfeiture of the policy under a provision contained therein that “this entire policy shall be void * * *…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griffey v. New York Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Peck v. New London County Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  3. Allen v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Aetna Insurance v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hill v. Winnsboro Granite Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API