Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel Curran

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 1, 2016No. 15-2511UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

Daniel Thomas Curran entered a conditional plea of guilty to charges of production, receipt, and possession of child pornography, pursuant to a plea agreement, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2), that preserved his right to appeal the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress. 1 He now appeals the denial of that motion, and contends, as well, that the Court erred in imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence of 840 months’ imprisonment (70 years). Because the Court correctly denied Curran’s motion to suppress, and because his sentence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. TomkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Rodney Lee MorganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LEWIS-BEY v. SMARTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. WENHOLD v. GAGLIONEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. WENHOLD v. GAGLIONEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API