United States v. Daniel Curran
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
Daniel Thomas Curran entered a conditional plea of guilty to charges of production, receipt, and possession of child pornography, pursuant to a plea agreement, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2), that preserved his right to appeal the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress. 1 He now appeals the denial of that motion, and contends, as well, that the Court erred in imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence of 840 months’ imprisonment (70 years). Because the Court correctly denied Curran’s motion to suppress, and because his sentence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. TomkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Rodney Lee MorganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LEWIS-BEY v. SMARTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- WENHOLD v. GAGLIONEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- WENHOLD v. GAGLIONEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024