Legal Opinion · Dissent

Howard S. v. LILLIAN S.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2010No. 71Published

1Dissent

Pigott, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent because, in my view, it is premature to rule that wife’s behavior does not, as a matter of law, constitute egregious misconduct for purposes of equitable distribution under the Domestic Relations Law. Therefore, husband is entitled to discovery on his claim.

It is well settled that parties are entitled to “full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action” (CPLR 3101 [a] [1]). This provision makes no exception for matrimonial actions. Further, as the majority recognizes, this Court has held that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Ginsberg v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. McMahan v. McMahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Lemke v. LemkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API