Legal Opinion

Mills & Arnold Lumber Co. v. Tanner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

— This controversy is before us on a writ of error to the circuit court of Adair county and the question of the sufficiency of the writ stands at the threshold of its consideration. The writ is as follows, omitting the attestation which is regular.

‘ ‘ The State of Missouri, SS:

“The State of Missouri, To the Judge of the First Judicial Circuit in said State, Greeting: Whereas, in the record and proceedings in a certain cause lately pending in the Adair Circuit Court wherein The Mills & Arnold Lumber Company was plaintiff and L. B. Tanner and Barbara Tanner were defendants, Paul D. Higbee,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reno v. JarrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Fidelity Trust Co. v. Mexico, Santa Fe & Perry Traction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. City of St. Louis v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Hopper v. FulbrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Bowersock v. Missouri Valley Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API