Legal Opinion
Aronson v. Rappaport
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1986Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Baer, Jr., J.
Plaintiff, Aronson, seeks a declaration that he is entitled to continued residential occupancy of his loft, notwithstanding the "commercial” form of his expired lease. The original complaint, which was served on May 20, 1982, contained a cause of action for such declaratory relief based upon plaintiff’s allegation that the subject building constituted a de facto multiple dwelling. In January 1984, plaintiff moved to amend his complaint to include a claim that the subject building *273constitutes an "interim multiple dwelling”, pursuant to Multiple Dwelling…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lane v. Mercury Record Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Lane v. Mercury Record Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Duane Thomas Loft Tenants Ass'n v. Sylvan Lawrence Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Aguilar v. RabinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Nirco Investors Corp. v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985