Hiskett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is a Motion for Order Compelling Discovery (doc. 50). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26, 33, 34, and 37 and D.Kan. Rule 37.1 and 37.2, defendant seeks an order to compel plaintiff to answer Interrogatory 15 of its First Interrogatories and produce one document responsive to Request 3 of its First Request for Production. Plaintiff opposes the motion.
Interrogatory 15 asks plaintiff to “state all facts and identify each and every witness and document that supports [her] allegation” that she “was denied the position because…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hilt v. SFC Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- United States v. BaheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Francisco LarranagaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Jones v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Aguinaga v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Moses v. HalsteadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Lucero v. ValdezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Lewis v. UNUM Corp. Severance PlanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Simmons Foods, Inc. v. WillisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.