Legal Opinion

Putnam v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 4, 1896No. 573, 574Published

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. This case having been submitted, the court ordered the judgment below to be affirmed. Subsequently, that judgment was vacated. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court 1

162 U.S. 687 (1896)

PUTNAM

v.

UNITED STATES.

SAME

v.

SAME.

Nos. 573, 574.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted January 23, 1896.

Decided May 4, 1896.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.

Mr. Frank S. Streeter for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error.

2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White

This is a writ of error to obtain a reversal of a judgment of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Hampshire, entered on a verdict of a jury, finding the defendant guilty upon the second and seventh counts of an indictment which alleged violations of the…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Nicholls v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1823

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API