Legal Opinion

Conover v. Board of County Commissioners of Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 1988No. Nos. 86-2554, 86-2711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We agree with the trial court that the allegedly negligent timing of a pedestrian control device (Walk-Don’t Walk) represents a planning decision as to which the governmental subdivision involved is immune. Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979); Trianon Park Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 468 So.2d 912 (Fla.1985); Dep’t of Transp. v. Neilson, 419 So.2d 1071 (Fla.1982); Weiss v. Fote, 7 N.Y.2d 579, 200 N.Y.S.2d 409, 167 N.E.2d 63 (1960) (cited with approval in Commercial Carrier Corp., 371 So.2d at 1010); Bjorkquist v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Department of Transp. v. NeilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. Barrera v. State Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Graber v. City of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API