Conover v. Board of County Commissioners of Metropolitan Dade County
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
We agree with the trial court that the allegedly negligent timing of a pedestrian control device (Walk-Don’t Walk) represents a planning decision as to which the governmental subdivision involved is immune. Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979); Trianon Park Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 468 So.2d 912 (Fla.1985); Dep’t of Transp. v. Neilson, 419 So.2d 1071 (Fla.1982); Weiss v. Fote, 7 N.Y.2d 579, 200 N.Y.S.2d 409, 167 N.E.2d 63 (1960) (cited with approval in Commercial Carrier Corp., 371 So.2d at 1010); Bjorkquist v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Department of Transp. v. NeilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Barrera v. State Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Graber v. City of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa · 2003