Lowe v. Pogue
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Pro se petitioner Lowe seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny this request pursuant to Rule 39.8. Lowe is allowed until April 19,1999, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38 and to submit his petitions in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33.1. We also direct the Clerk not to accept any farther petitions for certiorari nor petitions for extraordinary writs from Lowe in noncriminal matters unless he pays the docketing fee required by Rule 38 and submits his petition in compliance with Rule 33.1.
Lowe has abused this Court’s certiorari…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In re LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lowe v. CantrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1999