Legal Opinion

Maury County Board of Public Utilities v. City of Columbia

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 15, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

The plaintiffs were summarily granted injunctive relief against the City of Columbia [“City”] under the terms of their contracts with the Columbia Water System. The City has appealed. We affirm.

The City operates a water distribution system through its Board of Public Utilities, which does business as Columbia Water System [“CWS”]. Until 1991, CWS offered water service at three rates: urban (inside the city); suburban (outside the city); and private fire protection. The contracts between CWS and each of the plaintiffs provide for water service for a forty year term at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batson v. Pleasant View Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  2. Bybees Branch Water Ass'n v. Town of McMinnvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. City of Parsons v. Perryville Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mike Allmand v. Jon PavleticTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. The City of Chattanooga Ex Rel. Don Lepard, Qui Tam v. Electric Power Board of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API