Maury County Board of Public Utilities v. City of Columbia
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, Judge.
The plaintiffs were summarily granted injunctive relief against the City of Columbia [“City”] under the terms of their contracts with the Columbia Water System. The City has appealed. We affirm.
The City operates a water distribution system through its Board of Public Utilities, which does business as Columbia Water System [“CWS”]. Until 1991, CWS offered water service at three rates: urban (inside the city); suburban (outside the city); and private fire protection. The contracts between CWS and each of the plaintiffs provide for water service for a forty year term at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Batson v. Pleasant View Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Bybees Branch Water Ass'n v. Town of McMinnvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Parsons v. Perryville Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mike Allmand v. Jon PavleticTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- The City of Chattanooga Ex Rel. Don Lepard, Qui Tam v. Electric Power Board of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016