Legal Opinion

Hecht Co. v. Leite

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1953No. 1362PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Hecht Company, is the operator of a parking lot for hire. Plaintiff delivered her automobile to defendant’s employees for parking and it was returned to her in a damaged condition. This suit was to recover the amount of the damage.

Plaintiff did not appear at the trial or testify, and no evidence was introduced in her behalf, but the parties stipulated that there had been a -bailment of plaintiff’s automobile, that the automobile was returned to plaintiff in a damaged condition, and also stipulated as to the extent of the damage.

For defendant, a written statement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Columbia Operating Corp. v. KettlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. 1420 Park Road Parking, Inc. v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. National Mortgage & Inv. Corp. v. ShulmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Bernstein v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Davis v. Professional Bldg. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API