Afram Lines International, Inc. v. The M/v Capetan Yiannis, Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., in Rem, Brotherhood Shipping Co., Ltd., in Personam
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ATKINS, Senior District Judge:
This is an appeal from a district court order requiring the appellant, Afram Lines International, Inc. (“Afram”), to post coun-tersecurity pursuant to Rule E(7) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims (“Rule E(7)”). The order required Afram to post countersecurity in the amount of $4,724,475.74. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the district court abused its discretion in requiring Afram to post this sum. We therefore VACATE the district court’s order and REMAND the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
A
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Salazar v. Atlantic SunCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Titan Navigation, Inc. v. Timsco, Inc., Marine Leasing, Inc. And Rhc Industries, Inc., in Re Marine Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Bardach Iron & Steel Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
- In Re Incas and Monterey Printing and Packaging, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Result Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Ferruzzi Trading USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Dongbu Exp. Co., Ltd. v. Navios Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Rosemary v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- International Ship Repair & Marine Services Inc. v. Barge B. 215District Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- Trinidad Foundry & Fabricating, Ltd. v. M/V Kas CamillaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991