Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/1

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 2021No. D076767Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/7/21 Bauman v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D076767 JORDANA BAUMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- v. 00013452-CU-OR-CTL) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Cowan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Rakestraw v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API