Legal Opinion

Dial v. Rector

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Harrison. Motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the obligee in the appeal bond was dead when the bond was executed. After notice to appellant, the affidavits of two witnesses, who proved the fact, were taken before a notary, and filed with the motion.

1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.

In this case, a motion has been submitted to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the appeal bond was made after the death of the obligees. It is clear, that the bond, so made, is a nullity; and as, according to the decisions of this Court, an appeal bond is essential to the exercise of the jurisdiction of the Court, by appeal, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. A question of practice was made, as to how the fact of the death of the pbligee, before the bond was made, shall be proven in this Court. We have no doubt that *100it is competent to show the fact by affidavit, as has been done in…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Brown v. TorreyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Hart v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Smith & Williams v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Johnson v. RobesonTexas Supreme Court · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API