Legal Opinion

Kesner v. Inland Empire Land Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1928No. 21473. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

This appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs in an action on a guaranty by defendant of a note and mortgage. The facts necessary to a decision on the single question brought to us for consideration áre as follows:

The respondents purchased a note and mortgage given by Thomas A. and Edna Johnson covering a farm owned by them in Douglas county, Washington. The amount of the note and mortgage was twenty-eight hundred dollars. The collection thereof was guaranteed by the Inland Empire Land Company of Spokane, Washington. This contract of guaranty need not be set out, for we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleage v. LaidleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Donahue v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  3. Fall v. YoumansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. MacY v. Inland Empire Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Asarco LLC v. CohenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  2. Asarco LLC v. Loren M. CohenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  3. Pisha v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API